on average l see about one or two buildings a month suffering from nickel sulphide related failures(请问老师 related failures是不是过去分词短语做nickel sulphide的定语后置?为什么不能用现在分词relating failures呢?)谢谢

来源:学生作业帮助网 编辑:作业帮 时间:2024/05/01 10:09:10
on average l see about one or two buildings a month suffering from nickel sulphide related failures(请问老师 related failures是不是过去分词短语做nickel sulphide的定语后置?为什么不能用现在分词relating failures呢?)谢谢

on average l see about one or two buildings a month suffering from nickel sulphide related failures(请问老师 related failures是不是过去分词短语做nickel sulphide的定语后置?为什么不能用现在分词relating failures呢?)谢谢
on average l see about one or two buildings a month suffering from nickel sulphide related failures(请问老师 related failures是不是过去分词短语做nickel sulphide的定语后置?为什么不能用现在分词relating failures呢?)谢谢老师

on average l see about one or two buildings a month suffering from nickel sulphide related failures(请问老师 related failures是不是过去分词短语做nickel sulphide的定语后置?为什么不能用现在分词relating failures呢?)谢谢
你可能在原句落掉一个词,应该是nickel sulphide related to failures.relate failures 表示“讲述失败”, relate to failure 表示“与失败有关”.
  句中有两个分词短语.第一个现在分词suffering from … 是状语;第二个过去分词related to failures 是nickel sulphide的后置定语,可以改写为定语从句 which is related to failures.
  现在分词表示被修饰主动实施的行为,另如the explorer relating to his adventures,分词短语relating (to) 和 telling (about)意思差不多,是the explorer实施的行为,即“那个涉及到本人冒险经历的探险者”,也可以改写为定语从句 the explorer who relates to his adventures.
  过去分词表示被修饰词是被动接受该动作的对象,另如the explorers related to each other,分词the explorers(与…有亲戚关系)是related的行为对象 [改为主动是relate the explorers to each other(把探险者互相联系起来)] 即“彼此之间有(亲戚)关系的探险者”.
  基于此,nickel sulphide relating to failures的意思是“涉及到数次失败的硫化镍”, nickel sulphide related to failures 的意思是“与数次失败有关的硫化镍”,二者的意思有明显的差别.